7 May 2005

Modern Marriage

In light of all the current debate in the church about marriage, this article in the Washington Post gives quite a good summary of some of the recent research that has been done into the history of marriage and how much it has changed over the last several hundred years. The author, Stephanie Coontz, teaches family history at Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, USA, and is author of the recently published book, Marriage, a History: From Obedience to Intimacy, or How Love Conquered Marriage.

This quote from the article summarizes one of her main arguments:

The origins of modern marital instability lie largely in the triumph of what many people believe to be marriage’s traditional role — providing love, intimacy, fidelity and mutual fulfillment. The truth is that for centuries, marriage was stable precisely because it was not expected to provide such benefits. As soon as love became the driving force behind marriage, people began to demand the right to remain single if they had not found love or to divorce if they fell out of love.

I am certain that many people will disagree with a number of her conclusions, but the article is definitely good food for thought.

6 Responses to “Modern Marriage”

  1. Michael says:

    I like that article. It supports a lot of the things I think are true (and isn’t that really the criterion for a good argument? :-)

    Seriously, though, I agree that it’s food for thought. The interesting question I think she leaves open is this: Suppose we do accept that marriage is no longer the predominant mechanism for organizing sex roles, etc., in Western society. What will take its place? It seems to me that humans are too fickle for a society to remain stable with out some sort of organizing principle. So, if marriage isn’t it, what is?

  2. Holly Lynne says:

    The article’s points are well-taken. I saw that in the paper on Sunday, and put it with the “Darrin should read this” stack of articles. I’m meeting some of those issues right now. (BTW, pre-marital classes beat you over the head with these statistics.)

    What kills me is the fact that divorce *is* so common, and so “socially acceptable”. While I agree that there’s a time/place issue, “socially acceptable” shouldn’t equal “necessary”. In fact, James and I were talking last night about “starter marriages”! Now, I’ve heard of starter-homes, starter-cars… but marriages?!?

    I could rant for days…

  3. Michael says:

    Pre-marital classes? I didn’t realize one had to have a certificate (apart from perhaps a marriage license) in order to be married. Have I been missing something, or is my ignorance a simple consequence of atheism?

    I agree that the idea of a “starter marriage” is pretty weird.

  4. Jamie says:

    In my experience, almost all Christian or Jewish clergy will require the couple being married to attend a series of pre-marital classes, and I would guess that other faiths probably have something similar. The idea generally is to make sure that the couple are aware of some of the difficulties that marriage can entail and to see that they have discussed practical issues regarding how their lives will change by living with another person. In general, I think it is a good thing, if done well.

  5. Michael says:

    Oh, I know the sort of thing you mean now. I have definitely heard of that before.

    I guess I got distracted by the word “classes,” and had this idea of a half dozen nervous couples sitting in a room with bad marriage statistics on an overhead projector. :-)

  6. Holly Lynne says:

    :) Michael, your image wasn’t too far from correct. Fortunately, the leaders of our class are mentors of mine. It helped that they didn’t just provide statistics for the entire class, but solutions and encouragement, too.
    The most surprising statement that I remember from the class is that you may not always feel “in love” with the person you marry. Their point was that you’re in a committed partnership (with God and each other), and that commitment should be honored, regardless of what life brings your way.
    Once the shock of the previous statement passed, the latter statement was easy to take. Every couple contemplating marriage needs to hear that… and listen to it.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>