19 October 2005

‘American’ History

We had a chaplaincy film night this evening at one of the colleges that I work for where we viewed Snow Falling on Cedars, an excellent adaptation of David Guterson’s novel of the same title. I would highly recommend both the both the book and the film; the former for its flowing poetic language and intense detail and the latter for its hauntingly beautiful cinematography. The plot concerns the death of a fisherman working off the coast of a small island in the northwestern United States, but much of the story takes place during World War II and revolves around the many Japanese-Americans who were sent to internment camps for the duration of the war. There are those would probably like to forget that we locked up these people, the majority of whom were American citizens, for no other reason than their ethnic background, many of whom had in fact been born in the United States, the children of Japanese immigrants.

Two things were particularly striking about the short discussion that we had afterwards with some of the students who had watched the film. First was the fact that none of them had been aware of these American internment camps. Now, to be fair, these were British students, and I have already learned in my time here that the teaching of American history in this country is spotty at best. (In fact, the teaching of history here is not very good generally as I seem to have learned more about British history than many university students that I have met!) However, as the camps are a piece of American history that I certainly learned about in school, it was fascinating to hear the reactions of these students upon learning about it for the first time. As the film makes clear, this is still something that it in some ways still an open wound in the hearts and minds of many Americans.

The other thing of note in our conversations was the parallel to many events that we have been seeing today in the wake of the war in Iraq and the terrorist attacks of September 11th. While both the novel and the film tell a story about America’s past, it is clear to me that this is a piece of our history that we have not learned from. We have detained a number of American citizens over the past few years, without trial, for no other reason than that they have Middle Eastern ancestry. George Santayana’s famous quote is perhaps too much overused, but there is definitely truth to it:

Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.

I am concerned that we are in the process of repeating a part of our history, and doing so because we are not teaching people about it – perhaps even denying that it happened so as to ease our consciences. If even students at one of the best universities in the United Kingdom have not heard about these events, can we really assume that the majority of Americans are aware of them either? This kind of thing should not have been allowed to happen in the 1940’s and it should not be allowed to happen today. We must remember and learn from our history, no matter how painful, since we already seem to find ourselves repeating it.

4 Responses to “‘American’ History”

  1. Nathan says:

    Yep, I can confirm that teaching of British history is appalling: compulsory lessons stop at age 14 and early secondary topics tend to concentrate on 1066 through to the reformation. Shockingly this excludes a huge part of the political history that is necessary to understand the British system of government today: I would be very curious to know how many of your students know what the “Glorious Revolution” was, let alone explain how/what/when… :(

    For those of us who did perserve with history through to age 16, 20th century history was the major focus — the consequences of WWI and how that led to Hitler’s rise, for example. Curricula are constantly changing, but a few years after me, my sister studied the Russian Revolution and Hitler’s Germany. Unfortunately the small number of subjects taken at A Level meant I was unable to continue my formal history education past age 16.

    My impression was that part of the reason 14 year olds were so put off history and therefore chose not to take it was that it was perceived as “boring”. Poor teaching no doubt accounts for part of this, but the topics covered in the final year of compulsory history education are hardly the most thrilling either! There are so many other factors though, I could go on: political correctness plays a role I’m sure (conquering other nations=bad so Empire=evil); and the complexity of this period of our history probably makes it difficult to convey to younger children: it’s very much easier to teach children that you overthrew the “evil British” than it is to explain that it was necessary to get rid of a King simply because he was Catholic!

    On the particular subject of internment, I wonder how much this is off-curriculum because of British government policies during the Troubles in Northern Ireland? Wikipedia suggests internment is too common a practice in Britain. :(

  2. Michael says:

    Jamie wrote: “[N]one of them had been aware of these American internment camps.”

    Unfortunately, I think you would find the same lack of awareness among American students, as well. Few people in the U.S. seem to know about our World War II internment camps, not just the ones on Bainbridge Island, but also elsewhere along the west coast.

    The U.S. government has learned a few lessons about subtlety along the way, though; now when we are going to detain people, we do it offshore at places like Guantanamo Bay. That doesn’t make it any better, of course. It just decreases the press coverage.

  3. heather says:

    History…
    Yes, history teaching in the US is bad.
    And, from the comments, also not great in England.

    The only experience I had with English teaching of history was riding on a train and running into a British student who was going to travel to the US as an exchange student. She had to take a class in US history before coming over. My friend (also US citizen) and I looked through the book and discovered that they had totally omitted the US Civil War.

    Since I find that may people in the US are STILL fighting the civil war and it so impacts our politics and interactions, I was shocked to find this omission. Another friend suggested that Britian has had more civil wars so they don’t see it as such a big deal. Still, I was shocked.

  4. Holly Lynne says:

    This is precisely why the DAR and SAR have become increasingly involved in the academic review of American History books. We have committees of people who continually review what our students are being taught, and provide feedback to textbook selection committees and teachers across the country.

    In addition to review of textbooks and materials, DAR members are strongly encouraged to go out to the schools and give presentations on American History points that may not be covered well in the textbooks.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>