23 October 2006

Richard Dawkins

I’ve read several things by Richard Dawkins, the well-known British atheist scientist, and had heard about his new book, The God Delusion last week on The Colbert Report. I’ve never been particularly impressed by his arguments, but hadn’t been able to fully articulate why until I saw this article in the Church Times (pointed out by the daily episcopalian). The author, Giles Fraser, notes that

The root of the problem is that too many modern atheists adopt a position that is a photographic negative of a sort of Christianity believed only by the most conservative. God is X, says the modern atheist, giving a short definition that allegedly captures what all believers believe. This means that the God they reject doesn’t look anything like the God that most of us meet in our prayers.

This encapsulates pretty closely the way that I feel about Dawkins and his compatriots. There are any number of my atheist friends over the years with whom I have discussed my Christian faith at great length and in significant intellectual depth. I have never seen this kind of real understanding of the issues from Dawkins.

2 Responses to “Richard Dawkins”

  1. Iscah says:

    Check out this review, as well.

    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n20/eagl01_.html

    (I like God as this chap.)

  2. Jamie says:

    Thanks, that is quite good as well. Interestingly enough, I was not particularly impressed with Terry Eagleton’s work when I read it in college, but for the most part I enjoyed his critique of Dawkins’ book. He (unlike Dawkins) has clearly read far and wide in theology and despite the few things about which I would disagree with him, at least we would be able to have an intellectual conversation about religious belief. I do not imagine that would be possible with Dawkins.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

23 October 2006

Richard Dawkins

I’ve read several things by Richard Dawkins, the well-known British atheist scientist, and had heard about his new book, The God Delusion last week on The Colbert Report. I’ve never been particularly impressed by his arguments, but hadn’t been able to fully articulate why until I saw this article in the Church Times (pointed out by the daily episcopalian). The author, Giles Fraser, notes that

The root of the problem is that too many modern atheists adopt a position that is a photographic negative of a sort of Christianity believed only by the most conservative. God is X, says the modern atheist, giving a short definition that allegedly captures what all believers believe. This means that the God they reject doesn’t look anything like the God that most of us meet in our prayers.

This encapsulates pretty closely the way that I feel about Dawkins and his compatriots. There are any number of my atheist friends over the years with whom I have discussed my Christian faith at great length and in significant intellectual depth. I have never seen this kind of real understanding of the issues from Dawkins.

2 Responses to “Richard Dawkins”

  1. Iscah says:

    Check out this review, as well.

    http://www.lrb.co.uk/v28/n20/eagl01_.html

    (I like God as this chap.)

  2. Jamie says:

    Thanks, that is quite good as well. Interestingly enough, I was not particularly impressed with Terry Eagleton’s work when I read it in college, but for the most part I enjoyed his critique of Dawkins’ book. He (unlike Dawkins) has clearly read far and wide in theology and despite the few things about which I would disagree with him, at least we would be able to have an intellectual conversation about religious belief. I do not imagine that would be possible with Dawkins.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>